Back

The Artefact and Atrial Fibrillation: An Unholy Alliance

Author

Assoc Prof Harry Mond

Published

December 2, 2024

The most common error in ECG reporting we encounter is differentiating between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation particularly in poor quality tracings. Thankfully a confirmed report with this error is very rare. This is because the Techs putting the final stamp of approval on your reports are taught that:

“Atrial fibrillation with a regular ventricular response is actually sinus rhythm until proven otherwise.”— DR HARRY MOND

Such was the case with the accompanying ECG.

Our clever tech changed the rhythm strip and the diagnosis became obvious.

Sinus rhythm with first degree AV block.

We probably see at least one example each day.

Some examples:

This should be repeated but sometimes this is difficult to do.

The major footprint is QRS regularity.

The minor are the P waves.

However, this can sometimes fool you when there are atrial ectopics!!

Assoc Prof Harry Mond

Latest Articles

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

December 17, 2024

Rate dependent bundle branch block

We have previously discussed physiologic ventricular aberration with atrial ectopy or atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response. There is another type of ventricular aberration, which is slower and represents abnormal bundle branch physiology. This is a rate dependent bundle branch block.

December 17, 2024

Complete heart block with no AV dissociation

AV with slow ventricular response. The rate is 40BPM. In the good old days this was digitalis toxicity until proven otherwise. The clue is Bifascicular block. Many cardiologists are reluctant to call this complete heart block as there is no AV dissociation.Don’t be scared to call this complete heart block because that is what it is!!

December 17, 2024

Wenckebach without a pause!

This week we had a Holter monitor recording reported as complete heart block. For obvious reasons this can be a serious diagnosis, but the reporting cardiologist felt it was Wenckebach sequences and requested a review.