Fundamentals of Cardiac Pacing - CardioScan Australia
Free Trial

Fundamentals of Cardiac Pacing

By Assoc Prof Harry Mond
April 21, 2021
  • The basis of conventional cardiac pacing is the delivery by a lead cathode (red highlight, negative pole) of an electrical stimulus to normal myocytes, adjacent to the electrode-tissue interface.
  • If the voltage exceeds a myocardial threshold, there is an action potential resulting in chamber depolarisation and contraction.
  • Current then flows to the anode (yellow highlight, positive pole) completing the circuit.

How does electricity flow through the body?

Current generated in the pacemaker flows along the lead conductor and enters the cathode as electrons or ohmic energy (red highlight). In order to conduct through tissues, it must be converted to ionic energy and as the most frequent salt in the body is sodium chloride, the electrons are converted to negative chloride ions (Cl) in a complex electromechanical event at the electrode-tissue interface. These chloride ions then flow through the myocardium toward the anode or positive pole.

Because the cathode is negative, sodium ions (Na+) remain oriented to the cathode surface as stored charge and forms a temporary barrier or resistance to conduction, referred to as polarization, which increases as the energy is delivered. It then dissipates as an afterpotential. Meanwhile, the electrically negative chloride ions generate an electric field, which, if it exceeds the local myocyte cell membrane threshold, results in an action potential and with propagation, global depolarization of that chamber and cardiac contraction.

On the ECG, the global delivery of the energy is seen as a stimulus artefact.

The stimulus artefact represents the voltage amplitude over a period of time called the pulse width or duration. During energy delivery, there is a fall in voltage referred to as an exponential decay curve.

By definition, all electrical circuits are bipolar requiring a cathode and an anode. When applied to a conventional pacing lead, the terms unipolar and bipolar indicate the number of electrodes on the lead.  

An implantable unipolar lead has the cathode at the tip of the lead and the anode on the pulse generator surface. A bipolar lead has both cathode and anode on the lead, usually adjacent to each other near the lead tip.

In summary:

  • Unipolar leads were initially more popular because of lead diameter.
  • Bipolar and unipolar leads and pulse generators are today similar in size.
  • Unipolar pacing has issues with sensing, particularly in the atrium.
  • Bipolar pulse generators can now be programmed to unipolar pacing/sensing.
  • Today therefore, all pacing leads implanted are bipolar.

On the ECG, the stimulus artefact is large for unipolar pacing and small or absent for bipolar pacing.

These ECGs from the same patient, show dual chamber pacing; programmed unipolar above and bipolar below. V4 has been enlarged to demonstrate the stimulus artefacts. Large artefacts with unipolar pacing (red highlight) and small or absent with bipolar pacing (yellow highlight).

I am frequently asked if an ECG shows cardiac pacing. What are the clues:

  • The tracing must show paced beats and not only native rhythm.
  • Unipolar pacing is usually easy, but such tracings are rare today.
  • Ventricular pacing has a regular rhythm and usually a left bundle branch block configuration.
  • Bipolar stimulus artefacts are usually best seen in leads II, V2 to V4 as these leads are closest to the cathode (red highlight).

ECG tracings are frequently filtered to minimize artefact. These filters are usually applied at the time of the test but can be performed later on with reporting software.

An extreme example of turning OFF filters to identify the stimulus artefact (red highlight) is shown.

In most cases the changes are subtle (atrium red, ventricle yellow highlight), but  good enough to identify pacing.

When there is no obvious stimulus artefact, the timing and the paced QRS width becomes critical in determining pacing.

In this example there is atrial fibrillation and following a 1000 ms pause, there is a broad QRS complex without a stimulus artefact (red and blue highlight) almost certainly indicating ventricular pacing, as ventricular ectopics would occur earlier. The second paced complex is smaller, suggesting a fusion beat (blue highlight) and a ventricular ectopic or aberration (yellow highlight) further complicates interpretation.

The afterpotential of the unipolar stimulus artefact may distort the subsequent QRS.

In this example with unipolar pacing, there is a high threshold exit block and the second stimulus artefact (red highlight) does not depolarize the ventricle. The decay curve (red arrow) represents the afterpotential. Note in lead I, the complexes are near identical and exit block would have probably been missed.

The unipolar ventricular stimulus artefact may distort the appearance of the subsequent QRS, thus preventing determination of the QRS axis.

In this example, a temporary pacing lead (cathode) lies at the apex of the right ventricle (red cross). The anode used was a needle placed under the skin in various positions to indicate traditional pulse generator positions.

  • A: Right shoulder, red highlight
  • B: Left shoulder, yellow highlight
  • C: Epigastrium, blue highlight.

The QRS appearance should be the same irrespective of the anode position. However, the QRS is grossly distorted by the afterpotential resulting in a different axis for each position. Knowledge of the QRS axis is important in understanding where the pacing lead lies in the right ventricle which will be covered later.

Increasing the voltage output will also increase the stimulus artefact size and with unipolar pacing will further distort the subsequent QRS.                                                  The

R wave (red highlight) is artefact.

Respiration may also alter the size of the bipolar stimulus artefact with atrial

and ventricular pacing.

The vertical red arrows reflect the size of the stimulus artefacts with respiration.

Of course, the intracardiac stimulus artefacts do not change with respiration. Rather the transthoracic impedance changes with inspiration and expiration, altering the ECG lead dipole and hence the recorded stimulus artefact size.

Now you know all about the pacing stimulus artefact.

Harry Mond

About Assoc Prof Harry Mond

In 49+ years as a practicing cardiologist, Dr Harry Mond has published 260+ published manuscripts & books. A co-founder of CardioScan, he remains Medical Director and oversees 500K+ heart studies each year.

Download his full profile here.

View more
Clinical case studies Credentials Medical Papers Mobil-O-Graph myPatch Patient fact sheets